Mandatory masking requirements represent an interference with personal autonomy

Partager cette page :

Mandatory masking requirements represent an interference with personal autonomy

Share this:

 

The Justice Centre is closely watching the development of orders and regulations which mandate the use of masks in indoor public places and which require private establishments to enforce this directive.

For example, as of June 30, 2020, the Ontario government had resisted calls from some city mayors to impose a province-wide order requiring masks in all indoor spaces.

Mandatory masking is an interference with personal autonomy. For some people they are far more than a momentary inconvenience during a quick trip to the grocery store. For those who must wear them for hours on end, those with respiratory illnesses and those with conditions such as claustrophobia and PTSD, masks can be debilitating and even a threat to health. Some of the orders instituted regionally in Ontario fail to fully account for the rights of those who cannot wear a mask safely. Such failings would render the requirements unconstitutional as a result of unjustified violations of sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, namely the rights to liberty, security of the person, and equality.

In addition, the necessity for exempt persons to disclose private and confidential information to third parties by way of explanation to justify their inability to wear a mask creates privacy concerns which may render the mandatory mask requirements illegal.

As noted by Health Canada , the Center for Disease Control (US) and the World Health Organization, and as noted by the Justice Centre in our report Unprecedented and Unjustified: A Charter Analysis of Ontario’s Response to COVID-19 and No longer demonstrably justified: An Analysis of Alberta’s COVID-19 Modelling the data shows that for the vast majority of the population under 65 years old, COVID-19 is not life threatening.

We also note that Health Canada and the WHO recommend against mandatory mask wearing in circumstances where social distancing is possible. The WHO notes, “At the present time, the widespread use of masks everywhere is not supported by high-quality scientific evidence, and there are potential benefits and harms to consider.”

The Justice Centre continues to monitor developments regarding orders and regulations that impose the wearing of masks upon citizens.

Partager cette page :

Brian Jenkins portant un placard indiquant « Prions pour la fin de l’avortement » (avec l’aimable autorisation de Brian Jenkins)

Nouveau cas de censure politique à Sherbrooke

SHERBROOKE, QUÉBEC : Le Centre juridique pour les libertés constitutionnelles (CJLC) annonce que la Ville de Sherbrooke a retiré...
Journée de la vérité et de la réconciliation 2026

Justice: en finir avec les peines fondées sur l’origine

La simple assignation à résidence d’un chauffard ayant tué une fillette en Ontario fait réagir l'avocat John Carpay, qui dénonce...
Roger Song, avocat albertain (courtoisie de Roger Song)

Un avocat porte en appel sa contestation de la formation idéologique obligatoire imposée par le Barreau

CALGARY, AB : Le Centre juridique pour les libertés constitutionnelles (CJLC) annonce que des avocats financés par le CJLC...

Explore Related News

sep-19-MC
Read More
Photo credit: By Jerome
Read More
AdobeStock_251481411
Read More
sep-19-MC
Photo credit: By Jerome
AdobeStock_251481411
Ottawa War Memorial (Photo credit: S